Page 1 of 2
BoneCP Missing credits.
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 2:28 pm
by lord_rex
Dear UnAfraid! I saw you switched c3p0 to bonecp like as <fork> one week ago. My question is why did you missed the credit?
related links:
http://trac.l2jserver.com/changeset/4554
http://code.google.com/p/ <fork>/source/detail?r=341#
http://code.google.com/p/ <fork>/source/detail?r=342#
Re: BoneCP Missing credits.
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 2:49 pm
by UnAfraid
Sorry i was going to, but i did some mistake and commited it with some kind of weird key combination and.. not full description i was going to write credits and why we switching to it but..
i'll add credits in file on next commit
Re: BoneCP Missing credits.
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 2:51 pm
by lord_rex
ok, thanks for replay
for me not problem, just was a polite question.
Re: BoneCP Missing credits.
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 3:08 pm
by Intrepid
Theres no problem in taking stuff from eachother dont take it like that we are not in a frenzy about protecting our stuff
Re: BoneCP Missing credits.
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 3:22 pm
by momo61
What's the benefit in switching to BoneCP ? =)
Re: BoneCP Missing credits.
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 3:24 pm
by lord_rex
c3p0 is 10000000000000000000 years old and it's dead project.
boneCP is a fresh and live project. It's more faster and better. It has greater performance.
Re: BoneCP Missing credits.
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 3:27 pm
by momo61
lord_rex wrote:c3p0 is 10000000000000000000 years old and it's dead project.
boneCP is a fresh and live project. It's more faster and better. It has greater performance.
Faster, Better and Greater Performance sounds very good to me
Re: BoneCP Missing credits.
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 3:27 pm
by Intrepid
momo61 wrote:What's the benefit in switching to BoneCP ? =)
BoneCP is faster and its optimized for newest java and multithread apps.
Re: BoneCP Missing credits.
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 3:43 pm
by UnAfraid
Changeset 4572
And sorry about missed credits
Re: BoneCP Missing credits.
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 3:48 pm
by Intrepid
what the...i start to like the new l2j developer generation
Re: BoneCP Missing credits.
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 4:01 pm
by lord_rex
Intrepid wrote:
what the...i start to like the new l2j developer generation
me too. new L2J devs are better, good luck to project
Re: BoneCP Missing credits.
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:45 pm
by ThePhoenixBird
Maybe someone could do some performance tests
Re: BoneCP Missing credits.
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:24 am
by Intrepid
ThePhoenixBird wrote:Maybe someone could do some performance tests
Matter of setup for ex with partitionCount 2 BoneCP is around 20% slower than c3p0 but with partitionCount 3 BoneCP is around 30-40% faster. Also if you allow StatementCache you get a higher ram usage but much better result on CPU side or you can use lazy initialization etc etc...
Re: BoneCP Missing credits.
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 4:12 am
by ThePhoenixBird
I was looking for L2j Server specific tests.
Re: BoneCP Missing credits.
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 10:45 am
by Intrepid
ThePhoenixBird wrote:I was looking for L2j Server specific tests.
ohh...welll nobody did any before