BoneCP Missing credits.

lord_rex · Post by **lord_rex** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 2:28 pm

Dear UnAfraid! I saw you switched c3p0 to bonecp like as <fork> one week ago. My question is why did you missed the credit?

related links:
http://trac.l2jserver.com/changeset/4554
http://code.google.com/p/ <fork>/source/detail?r=341#
http://code.google.com/p/ <fork>/source/detail?r=342#

Post by **UnAfraid** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 2:49 pm

Sorry i was going to, but i did some mistake and commited it with some kind of weird key combination and.. not full description i was going to write credits and why we switching to it but..

i'll add credits in file on next commit

lord_rex · Post by **lord_rex** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 2:51 pm

ok, thanks for replay

for me not problem, just was a polite question.

Intrepid · Post by **Intrepid** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 3:08 pm

Theres no problem in taking stuff from eachother dont take it like that we are not in a frenzy about protecting our stuff

momo61 · Post by **momo61** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 3:22 pm

What's the benefit in switching to BoneCP ? =)

lord_rex · Post by **lord_rex** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 3:24 pm

c3p0 is 10000000000000000000 years old and it's dead project.
boneCP is a fresh and live project. It's more faster and better. It has greater performance.

momo61 · Post by **momo61** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 3:27 pm

lord_rex wrote:c3p0 is 10000000000000000000 years old and it's dead project.
boneCP is a fresh and live project. It's more faster and better. It has greater performance.

Faster, Better and Greater Performance sounds very good to me

Intrepid · Post by **Intrepid** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 3:27 pm

momo61 wrote:What's the benefit in switching to BoneCP ? =)

BoneCP is faster and its optimized for newest java and multithread apps.

Post by **UnAfraid** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 3:43 pm

Changeset 4572
And sorry about missed credits

Intrepid · Post by **Intrepid** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 3:48 pm

UnAfraid wrote:Changeset 4572
And sorry about missed credits

what the...i start to like the new l2j developer generation

lord_rex · Post by **lord_rex** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 4:01 pm

Intrepid wrote:
UnAfraid wrote:Changeset 4572
And sorry about missed credits
what the...i start to like the new l2j developer generation

me too. new L2J devs are better, good luck to project

Post by **ThePhoenixBird** » Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:45 pm

Maybe someone could do some performance tests

Intrepid · Post by **Intrepid** » Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:24 am

ThePhoenixBird wrote:Maybe someone could do some performance tests

Matter of setup for ex with partitionCount 2 BoneCP is around 20% slower than c3p0 but with partitionCount 3 BoneCP is around 30-40% faster. Also if you allow StatementCache you get a higher ram usage but much better result on CPU side or you can use lazy initialization etc etc...

Post by **ThePhoenixBird** » Mon Apr 18, 2011 4:12 am

I was looking for L2j Server specific tests.

Intrepid · Post by **Intrepid** » Mon Apr 18, 2011 10:45 am

ThePhoenixBird wrote:I was looking for L2j Server specific tests.

ohh...welll nobody did any before

L2J Server

BoneCP Missing credits.

BoneCP Missing credits.

Re: BoneCP Missing credits.

Re: BoneCP Missing credits.

Re: BoneCP Missing credits.

Re: BoneCP Missing credits.

Re: BoneCP Missing credits.

Re: BoneCP Missing credits.

Re: BoneCP Missing credits.

Re: BoneCP Missing credits.

Re: BoneCP Missing credits.

Re: BoneCP Missing credits.

Re: BoneCP Missing credits.

Re: BoneCP Missing credits.

Re: BoneCP Missing credits.

Re: BoneCP Missing credits.