Non-workinkg Lure - make it or revert 3585?

This is not a Support area! Discuss about the Server here. Non-Server related discussion goes in Off-Topic Discussion.
Forum rules
READ NOW: L2j Forums Rules of Conduct
Post Reply
lanabel
Posts: 236
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Russia

Non-workinkg Lure - make it or revert 3585?

Post by lanabel »

It's wery good that mobs' socialness is working better now after 3585, but it is no worth without working Lure-type skills. Is anyone working on this problem for nearest future or should I just locally revert 3585, because players are crying that there is no any way to pull mobs one by one? :?:

P.S. I see it's a common feature of L2J commits - bad things for players come much faster than good ones (remember raising raids' HP in C5 and adjusting their stats accordingly only now) :?
_DS_
L2j Veteran
L2j Veteran
Posts: 3437
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 8:53 am
Location: Russia

Re: Non-workinkg Lure - make it or revert 3585?

Post by _DS_ »

Are you try to search contribs on forum ? If you want "all, here and now" - use it.

Players ALWAYS cry, this is normal. And luring mobs one by one using debuffs is an exploit. If you prefer exploit - revert this changeset.
Commiter of the shit
public static final int PI = 3.1415926535897932384626433832795;
lanabel
Posts: 236
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Russia

Re: Non-workinkg Lure - make it or revert 3585?

Post by lanabel »

Oh, I looked in tickets and not in contribs, sorry. I was really upset about closed ticket for unsolved problem. Closing old bugs with making new ones is nothing good. That exploit is so old, it could wait until you make a good solution for lure problem. Until than it could be just a forum contrib with known problems (not commited as not retail-like!).
_DS_
L2j Veteran
L2j Veteran
Posts: 3437
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 8:53 am
Location: Russia

Re: Non-workinkg Lure - make it or revert 3585?

Post by _DS_ »

PROBLEM WAS DESCRIBED in the changeset ! Whats the matter to create another tickets, just for flooding the trac ?
Lets revert several another changesets, with another "very, very old" exploits - you will have happiest players in the world.
And if no one before has interest or time to fix this exploit - this is not mean what it should not be fixed at all.

Closed.
Commiter of the shit
public static final int PI = 3.1415926535897932384626433832795;
Post Reply