L2J Server

Intrepid wrote: ohh...welll nobody did any before

And thats the reason of http://trac.l2jserver.com/changeset/4576

Aikimaniac wrote:

Intrepid wrote: ohh...welll nobody did any before

And thats the reason of http://trac.l2jserver.com/changeset/4576

Well revert something without atleast read about it is stupid but anyway its inner circle so i guess no suprise at all

I wonder when it will be copied back with l2j credits again

Meh, l2j doesn't like to change things at all, so no surprise really.
I don't know if BoneCP is actually better, I've read it has some minuses too, but in general that's the case.

Intrepid wrote:

Aikimaniac wrote:

Intrepid wrote: ohh...welll nobody did any before

And thats the reason of http://trac.l2jserver.com/changeset/4576

Well revert something without atleast read about it is stupid but anyway its inner circle so i guess no suprise at all

I wonder when it will be copied back with l2j credits again

lol..implementing without any single test is stupid more..isnt ?

Intrepid wrote: Well revert something without atleast read about it is stupid but anyway its inner circle so i guess no suprise at all

I wonder when it will be copied back with l2j credits again

Implementing without any single test is stupid more..isnt ? [/quote]

jurchiks wrote:Meh, l2j doesn't like to change things at all, so no surprise really.
I don't know if BoneCP is actually better, I've read it has some minuses too, but in general that's the case.

yes...you dont know if its better but you keep bitching for any reason...you take any possible opportunity just to bitch and bitch and bitch..if its so bad..why you waste your time here ?

But of course, that's all I do. But when I actually try to improve something then there's the golden silence or "we like it the old way". I actually try to do something instead of only posting when an argument comes up! Get your head out of your ass!

jurchiks wrote:But of course, that's all I do. But when I actually try to improve something then there's the golden silence or "we like it the old way". I actually try to do something instead of only posting when an argument comes up! Get your head out of your ass!

well...instead of bitching...post some test results...comparisons...what ever to prove your way is better...but according performance i fully trust first nBd and core devs in l2j... so as JIV pointed already..focus on missing stuff if thats not problem for you... thanks

avoid in future insulting of anyone on forums..

Aikimaniac wrote: Implementing without any single test is stupid more..isnt ?

I did tests before commit it ..
I am currently using it since a week and could be more.. i didnt notice anything strange

Intrepid wrote:I wonder when it will be copied back with l2j credits again

Missing credits was just a small mistake by our newbie developers, it was quickly fixed as you saw.

After some tests the team will decide if we revert again back to BoneCP and of course your credits will be there.

Here on L2j we dont steal credits from other pple work.

*fork* has been using it for 8 months now - we don't have any real statistic data but we can say overall db performance is faster than c3p0

How exactly is it missing credits. Is lord_rex and interpid the creators of boneCP ? LoL. The project is open source, everyone is allowed to use it so everyone can put it in his project without giving any credits to anyone. Grow up, you didnt discover the wheel or something, you just changed a pooling library in your project.

and now is good time to lock