krateisCube

[hope]

If you want to receive support we need this info to help you properly.
» Find Revision
L2J Revision Number:4211
L2JDP Revision Number:7423
http://www.l2jdp.com/trac/browser/trunk ... rateisCube

what type should it be as in the sql it is L2Npc as the files seem to be already there

[hope]

any one going to help with this

[hope]

why has no dev replied to this post one simple question is all

[janiii]

there is no use of those files. was probably commited by kerberos by mistake.

[jurchiks]

what do you mean - no use? we already have retail htm's, that's good! The fact that they're not used atm is nothing, it would be worse if we had the script but not htm's.

[janiii]

what do you mean - no use? we already have retail htm's, that's good! The fact that they're not used atm is nothing, it would be worse if we had the script but not htm's.

how do you know they did not change since 10.4.2009 ? are you sure?
besides, i ment that they are not used and cannot be accessed now with any npc instance. so there is no meaning they are in svn now. as already said, they were probably commited by mistake.
if hope can make use of it, he can, but he would have to make a new npc instance or other core modifications for it.

[jurchiks]

I know what you meant... you probably didn't understand me.
Its better having something than nothing.

[janiii]

I know what you meant... you probably didn't understand me.
Its better having something than nothing.

PS: this is going offtopic. i did answer hope's question already, there is no discussion about "it is better to have something than nothing". thanks.