Page 4 of 11
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2016 11:40 pm
by Sydark
the address as lord posted WAS a furniture locaiton xD but when u look into the area property detail its actually a building ppl can rent out area for there business and when u check u see they have 1 law firm there that handles intellectual property
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
but it becomes curious why bother now ? and not 10 years ago at the prime of L2
Clicky
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2016 11:42 pm
by vangog
I won't understand one and here server part, it can be written somehow, it is all the same, that to submit a claim to Java, for writing of this code in language to Java

ABSURDITY!
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2016 11:45 pm
by lord_rex
Sydark wrote:the address as lord posted WAS a furniture locaiton xD but when u look into the area property detail its actually a building ppl can rent out area for there business and when u check u see they have 1 law firm there that handles intellectual property
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
but it becomes curious why bother now ? and not 10 years ago at the prime of L2
Clicky
But NCZ0ft won't entrust a rented wardrobe law firm...
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2016 11:50 pm
by Sydark
lord_rex wrote:Sydark wrote:the address as lord posted WAS a furniture locaiton xD but when u look into the area property detail its actually a building ppl can rent out area for there business and when u check u see they have 1 law firm there that handles intellectual property
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
but it becomes curious why bother now ? and not 10 years ago at the prime of L2
Clicky
But NCZ0ft won't entrust a rented wardrobe law firm...
who knows what they doing IF its even NCZ0ft i mean NCZ0ft has its own legal department that is paid i really doubt like u said they would entrust this kind of information to some outside rented out spot considering NCZ0ft is in texas which has its own legal team already lol but if the cost to carry this is near to nothing of what it would cost hey they might have xD
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2016 11:52 pm
by lord_rex
Sydark wrote:lord_rex wrote:Sydark wrote:the address as lord posted WAS a furniture locaiton xD but when u look into the area property detail its actually a building ppl can rent out area for there business and when u check u see they have 1 law firm there that handles intellectual property
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
but it becomes curious why bother now ? and not 10 years ago at the prime of L2
Clicky
But NCZ0ft won't entrust a rented wardrobe law firm...
who knows what they doing IF its even NCZ0ft i mean NCZ0ft has its own legal department that is paid i really doubt like u said they would entrust this kind of information to some outside rented out spot considering NCZ0ft is in texas which has its own legal team already lol but if the cost to carry this is near to nothing of what it would cost hey they might have xD
It is not about cost. It is about authenticity.
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 12:01 am
by LasTravel
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 12:05 am
by lord_rex
Yeah, the one on github contains parts of it. What a nice copy-paste. But sure, a good way to make a scam look like official.
Too sad. The address doesn't match.
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 12:09 am
by vangog
links not work...ERR_NAME_NOT_RESOLVED
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 12:11 am
by lord_rex
vangog wrote:links not work...ERR_NAME_NOT_RESOLVED
replace z and 0 with s and o
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 12:42 am
by vangog
ep... replace only Z
why addresses different The designated Copyright Agent for NCZ0ft
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 1:11 am
by lord_rex
vangog wrote:ep... replace only Z
why addresses different The designated Copyright Agent for NCZ0ft
I've explained above. Because the DMCA submitter is an L2OFF server owner kiddo trying to eliminate the concurrency in a really hilarious and pitiful way - NCZ0ft has never made such reckless move.
The 2 different addresses are just one of the many proofs that the DMCA report is a forged bullshit.
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 3:10 am
by pokiokio
Aristos wrote:It is quite remarkably well written
For the most part, it is. Except for this:
The copyrights at issue are the copyrights in the proprietary game software code (specifically, the server-side code) which allow users to access and play the Games via the NCZ0ft server.
I don't think legal documents are supposed to even have a hint of grammatical error.

Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 6:31 am
by Sacrifice
What a grace has made the baby!...
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 9:16 am
by pokiokio
Sacrifice wrote:What a grace has made the baby!...
Eh?
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 10:03 am
by Sacrifice
I was referring to man/woman, that has made the DMCA, which has the grace in the ass, like wasps.
