L2J Server

The best idea is to wait quietly and avoid them losing time closing trolltopics

isnt it nice, we meet here all together

Would someone start a list about missing\incomplete\bugged features since C1?

ThePhoenixBird wrote:Would someone start a list about missing\incomplete\bugged features since C1?

This would really help us the devs a lot to know what is missing and get something to do on our free times

ThePhoenixBird wrote:Would someone start a list about missing\incomplete\bugged features since C1?

first step: party matching

denser wrote:

ThePhoenixBird wrote:Would someone start a list about missing\incomplete\bugged features since C1?

first step: party matching

I think it is implented already?

yes it is..almost forget sry

Siegeable Clan Halls. I've never seen those working on l2j.

it in contribs,testing etc

How to get a Forum Contribution Commited:

• Clean Coding, make it easy to read.
• Do not HARDcode your stuff, while less code you use the better.
• Test it and give feedback.
• Test it and give feedback.
• Test it and give feedback.
• Test it and give feedback.

ThePhoenixBird wrote:How to get a Forum Contribution Commited:

• Clean Coding, make it easy to read.
• Do not HARDcode your stuff, while less code you use the better.
• Test it and give feedback.
• Test it and give feedback.
• Test it and give feedback.
• Test it and give feedback.

viewtopic.php?f=55&t=13613&hilit=benom
5 pages about tests and beedback, commited? No.

viewtopic.php?f=69&t=18044&hilit=sailren
5 pages about tests and beedback, commited? No.

viewtopic.php?f=69&t=18838&hilit=clan+hall#p101373
9 pages about tests and beedback, commited? No.

I think, if one user can code something he prefer non share and use his work for his own project/server and non share nothing... On the whole forum you can found some contribs what "are not totally ignored by the dev team" but also are not commited so it affect too...

PS: Just my opinion :/

I'm very pessimistic about community testing. Bugreports are rare and usually useless.
For example: BigBoss's blockchecker event was several months on the forum, leeched by hundreds, and ? On next day after commit and install on live i got problems. This is happens not because BigBoss is a bad programmer, but because of poor testing.

Just my opinion.

_DS_ wrote:I'm very pessimistic about community testing. Bugreports are rare and usually useless.
For example: BigBoss's blockchecker event was several months on the forum, leeched by hundreds, and ? On next day after commit and install on live i got problems. This is happens not because BigBoss is a bad programmer, but because of poor testing.

Just my opinion.

And its not tested by devs because they dont wanna bother with boring tests I hate testing too, but it has to be done >.<

nik wrote: And its not tested by devs because they dont wanna bother with boring tests I hate testing too, but it has to be done >.<

woot?
all commit tested by devs and on devs server.. lol

lion wrote:

nik wrote: And its not tested by devs because they dont wanna bother with boring tests I hate testing too, but it has to be done >.<

woot?
all commit tested by devs and on devs server.. lol

Ahh yeah, well, the first tests